LunaProxy vs PYPROXY in 2025
As web scraping, automation, and geo-targeted marketing become more prevalent, choosing a reliable residential proxy provider is more important than ever. Two strong contenders in this space are LunaProxy and PyProxy — both offering powerful features, but with different strengths.
In this article, we’ll compare LunaProxy and PyProxy across key areas like proxy types, performance, pricing, developer support, and use cases to help you pick the best service for your needs.
| Feature | LunaProxy | PyProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Supported Proxy Types | Residential, Datacenter | Residential, Datacenter, ISP (Static) |
| IP Pool Size | 200M+ IPs in 195+ countries | 90M+ IPs in 190+ countries |
| IP Rotation | Automatic + Custom Session Control | Frequent rotation, less session control |
Verdict: LunaProxy has a larger IP pool and wider country coverage, making it a solid choice for high-scale scraping. PyProxy supports more proxy types, offering greater flexibility.
| Feature | LunaProxy | PyProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Uptime Guarantee | 99.9% | 99.9% |
| Average Speed | ~18.9 Mbps (based on tests) | Stable under high loads |
| Peak Load Handling | Slight delay under heavy loads | Handles concurrency better |
Verdict: LunaProxy is faster under normal conditions. PyProxy shines in high-concurrency scenarios, making it ideal for demanding tasks.
| Feature | LunaProxy | PyProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Residential Pricing | $0.77/GB (pay-as-you-go) | $0.77/GB (starting) |
| ISP/Static Proxy | $3/IP (weekly) | $3/IP (weekly) |
| Best For | Enterprise-scale data scraping | Flexible, small team usage |
Verdict: Pricing is similar at entry level. LunaProxy offers better volume discounts, while PyProxy suits smaller, budget-conscious teams.
| Feature | LunaProxy | PyProxy |
|---|---|---|
| API Documentation | Clear, beginner-friendly | Full-featured, more technical |
| Developer-Friendly | Easy onboarding, supports sticky/rotating sessions | High customizability for tech-savvy users |
| Integration Tools | SDKs, Webhooks, rotation control | Supports automation scripts, community tools |
Verdict: LunaProxy is easier for quick setup. PyProxy offers advanced control for developers who want deeper integration.
| Feature | LunaProxy | PyProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Anonymity | High — large IP pool, auto-rotation | Strong — real IPs, controlled rotation |
| CAPTCHA Bypass | Reliable in most cases | Effective with manual tuning for some targets |
Verdict: LunaProxy provides plug-and-play stealth. PyProxy allows for more persistent sessions for advanced anti-ban strategies.
| Use Case | LunaProxy | PyProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Large-scale Web Scraping | Yes | Yes |
| SERP Monitoring / SEO | Yes | Yes |
| E-commerce Verification | Yes | Yes |
| Social Media Automation | Possible | Yes |
| QA / App Testing | Possible | Yes |
| Bot Development | Possible | Yes |
Verdict: LunaProxy is well-suited for marketing and SEO. PyProxy excels in dev-heavy automation and scripting tasks.
| Feature | LunaProxy | PyProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Support Channels | Live Chat, Email, WhatsApp | Email, Telegram, Forum |
| Response Time | Fast | Community-based, developer-focused |
| Dashboard UI | Simple and modern | Rich features, more technical layout |
Verdict: LunaProxy provides a smoother UI and faster customer service. PyProxy supports deeper technical use but with a steeper learning curve.
|If You Are...|Choose| |A business needing quick deployment, wide IP coverage, and fast speed|LunaProxy| |A developer or small team needing flexibility, control, and scripting power|PyProxy|
Both LunaProxy and PyProxy are solid proxy platforms with reliable service and great value. Your final decision should depend on your technical needs and scaling goals.
